Will the guilty be punished?
Anything but 'adarsh': Swindle in the name of war widows
AI CMD leases house for 36L, gets govt rap
आओ लड़ें भ्रष्टाचार से. FIGHT CORRUPTION. भ्रष्टाचार है - तथ्यों को तोड़-मरोड़ कर पेश करना, कानून की अवहेलना, योग्यता के मुकाबले निजी पसंद को तरजीह देना, रिश्वत लेना, कामचोरी, अपने कर्तव्य का पालन न करना, सरकार और सरकारी विभागों में आज कल यही हो रहा है. बेशर्मी भी शर्मसार हो गई है यहाँ.

ecords of corruption set by Maha CMs. Name is Adarsh Society, but actions ........
This is the story of a whistleblower, Abhijit Ghosh, who has retired as General Manager of Central Bank of India. He blew the whistle on H A Daruwalla, then Chairperson and Managing Director of the bank. In the eyes of the bank, Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), Government, he has committed a crime of exposing the organized corruption in the bank. He was harassed and victimized.It is very difficult to believe that a person who has manipulated his own appointment as CVO will be an honest investigator in corruption cases. Manipulation in India does not come free. It needs both money and contacts at the right places. A CVO once commented that this is a life-time chance in his service life, and he will be a fool if he does not take advantage of it. He said that he has to recover the money he has spent on securing this appointment. I told him that I am totally against these outsider CVOs as they will be putting their own interest over the interest of the organization. Seeing the performance of successive CVOs in India's National Standards Body, Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), I have been proved right.
It is required to provide solutions to the problems, but problems should not be created in the name of providing solutions. Successive CVOs in BIS have created vigilance problems to prove that they are needed and then to assert their authority. If today, BIS is mired in neck-deep corruption then it is because of these outsider CVOs. I remember writing in one issue of Contact (BIS Officers Association Journal) that a Police Station has been opened in BIS.
The case of Ms Harjot Kaur, IAS CVO in BIS is fresh in mind. She openly threatened (in presence of DG) members of BIS Employees Union. She organized illegal raids on some Mumbai licensees to teach lesson to a WRO officer. Complaints were lodged against her. What action has been taken on these complaints has not been informed to the complainants (BISEU and me). She suddenly went on long leave and had not returned till date.
In my comments sent to CVC on draft NACS, I have emphasized on this point. I have commented that CVC should put its own house in order and make CVOs accountable, so that they do not become a link in organized corruption chain in the organization. They should effectively and efficiently fight against corruption as third party and should not themselves become part of the corruption.
In case of Vinod Dhamija, another CVO in BIS, he was even made head of some departments of BIS. He created his own interest group in BIS and took all advantages. CVOs in BIS have manipulated number of cadre officers to be appointed in vigilance department in HQ and also in some RO/BO. It has depleted the strength of cadre and made these officers ineligible for promotions under FCS. Then CVO and DG violated provisions of FCS to get them promoted. My complaints are there but no action has been taken so far on these violations. All this puts a serious doubt on the honesty and integrity of DA, CVO and the officers who have worked in, or working in vigilance activity or have been illegally promoted.
To achieve the target of zero percent corruption in BIS, the pre-requisite is that BIS has honest, impartial and committed CVO and other officers in vigilance department. The purpose should not be to punish people but to achieve zero corruption in BIS. The initiative should come from the top. Regular and effective monitoring and review is needed in all work areas of the organization. Feedback from any source should be welcome and action be initiated. Who gives the feedback is not important, but to act on it is important.
Let CVOs prove their credentials.
It will be better to define corruption based on the methodology, as ‘unorganized corruption’ and ‘organized corruption’. Unorganized corruption will include petty corruption. Political and administrative corruption will come under organized corruption. Whereas people involved in unorganized corruption are exposed, caught and punished, the people involved in organized corruption may be exposed, may also be caught but hardly punished. The corruption loop in unorganized corruption is very short mostly revolving around the accused person, but in organized corruption the corruption loop is very large and includes the top and even the investigating and prosecuting persons or agencies.
Presently, the will is lacking to attack organized corruption. Under public and media pressure, organized corruption is sometimes investigated but every attempt is made to dilute it or give the accused persons a clean chit. I have taken up the ‘issue of attacking organized corruption’ with successive CVCs but did not get any response.
To quote from draft NACS – “Acceptance of bribe by the top management makes the subordinates follow the leader”. This in reality is happening in majority of organizations. Top management in such organizations provides total protection to corrupt subordinates, and CVOs posted in that organization also form a link in organized corruption chain (OCC).
The two main causes of administrative corruption as identified by draft NACS are: (a) inability of the civil servants to resist extraneous influences; and (b) active collusion. The active collusion of top with CVO also ensures the protection of CVC, which intentionally or un-intentionally becomes a link in OCC.
A citizen (includes a whistleblower) sends complaints about corruption to CVO but the complaints are not acknowledged and registered if these are against a person or persons belonging to OCC. Frustrated citizen complains to CVC. CVC after a long time sends a stock reply – “Your complaint has been duly examined in the commission and having regard to the nature of issues raised therein, the same has been forwarded to (Name) CVO of (Name) the organization for necessary action. As such, while no further report is required to be sent to the commission, the authorities concerned are required to look into and take such action as deemed fit.”
CVC sends back the complaint to the same CVO who had not taken any action earlier. Why would he take action now when he is not even asked to inform CVC about the action he has taken on the complaint? The result – nothing happens to the accused person(s) being the part of OCC, but the person who had made the complaint is made to suffer.
This is essential that CVC should put its own house in order and make its CVOs accountable. CVO is the most important link in fighting corruption, but it is also the weakest link. Most of the CVOs come on deputation to avoid out-of-station transfer. This they manage through any means. They willingly join the OCC and become an important link in shielding person(s) belonging to OCC.
My comments are based on my personal experience over a long period of time. NACS should incorporate a strategy for fighting Organized Corruption at an appropriate place."